Language and Politics: Metaphors as Linguistic Strategies in the Political Corruption Issue in Taiwan

Lin, Cheng-wen

The University of York, United Kingdom

Paper

It has generally been held that metaphors have significant rhetorical uses in political communication. In particular, studies have increasingly centred on the use of metaphor in politics, since Lakoff and Johnson’s (1980) seminal work provides an account of metaphor which can contribute to the construction and comprehension of social and political reality. In election campaigns, politicians use metaphors to evoke emotions, reinforce specific platform, attack opponents, and manipulate the electorate (Beer & De Landtsheer 2004; Wilson 1990). In this respect, this study is concerned with how politicians manage metaphors in current Taiwanese political discourse, focusing on the issue with particular reference to political corruption, especially so-called “black- gold politics” (money politics or the connection between criminals with money and politicians) during the 2004 presidential election campaign in Taiwan. The aim of this study is to address the following questions: (1) What are the metaphors that are deployed by politicians during the 2004 presidential election campaign in Taiwan? (2) What are the functions of these metaphors? (3) How do these metaphors work to help communicate effectively? (4) How do politicians respond to their opponents’ metaphors, especially for discussing contentious political issues? Finally, by examining the linguistic strategies, the analysis is intended to help better comprehend political communication and the sociopolitical context in current Taiwan society.

References

Bavelas, J.B., Black, A., Chovil, N. and Mullett, J. (1990) Equivocal Communication. Newbury Park: Sage.

Beer, F. A. and De Landtsheer, C. (2004) Metaphorical World Politics. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.

Black, M. (1962) Metaphor. In M. Black, Models and Metaphors. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, pp. 25-47.

Bull, P. (2003) The Microanalysis of Political Communication: Claptrap and Ambiguity. London/New York: Routledge.

Chilton, P., & Schaffner, C. (1997) Discourse and politics. In Discourse as Social Interaction. (ed.) by A. Van Dijk. Sage.

Chilton, P., and Ilyin, M. (1993) Metaphor in political discourse: The case of the common European house. Discourse & Society 4(1), 7-31.

Edelman, M. (1971) Politics as Symbolic Action. Chicago: Markham Publishing Co.

Gao, G. and Ting- Toomey, S. (1998) Communicating Effectively with the Chinese. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Lakoff, G. (1991) Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. Journal of Urban and Cultural Studies 2(1), 59-72.

Lakoff, G. (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought 2d ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University, pp. 202-251.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mio, J.S. (1997) Metaphor and politics. Metaphor and Symbol 12(2), 113-133.

Obeng, S.G., & Hartford, B. (eds) (2002) Surviving through Obliqueness: Language of Politics in Emerging Democracies. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

Richards, I.A. (1936) The Philosophy of Rhetoric. London: Oxford University Press.

Semjno, E., & Masci, M. (1996) Politics is football: Metaphor in the discourse of Silvio Berlusconi. Discourse & Society 7(2), 243-269.

Wilson, J. (1990) Politically Speaking. Basil Blackwell.

Session: Paper session
Legal / (Public) Communication
Saturday, April 5, 2008, 09:00-10:30
room: 18